The change is very subtle. If we have a single-char cluster that
decomposes to three or more characters, then try recomposition, in
case the farther mark may compose with the base.
Essentially move the glyph mapping to normalization process.
The effect on Devanagari is small (but observable). Should be more
observable in simple text, like ASCII.
This reverts commit 0981068b75.
I was confused. Even if we access coverage[0] unconditionally, we don't
need bound checks since the array machinary already handles that.
Apparently even that doesn't make check-internal-symbols.sh happy with
mingw32. Going to disable that for DLLs again, but hopefully the
export-file is doing *something*.
'rclt' is "Required Contextual Forms" being proposed by Microsoft.
It's like 'calt', but supposedly always on. We apply 'calt' anyway,
and now apply this too.
At this point, the GDEF glyph synthesis looks pointless. Not that I
have many fonts without GDEF lying around.
As for mark advance zeroing when GPOS not available, that also is being
replaced by proper fallback mark positioning soon.
We need the font for glyph lookup during GSUB pauses in Indic shaper.
Could perhaps be avoided, but at this point, we don't mean to support
separate substitute()/position() entry points (anymore), so there is
no point in not providing the font to GSUB.
Gives me a good 10% speedup for the Devanagari test case. Less so
for less lookup-intensive tests.
For the Devanagari test case, the false positive rate of the GSUB digest
is 4%.
If there is no GPOS, zero mark advances.
If there *is* GPOS and the shaper requests so, zero mark advances for
attached marks.
Fixes regression with Tibetan, where the font has GPOS, and marks a
glyph as mark where it shouldn't get zero advance.
When we removed the separate Hangul shaper, the specific normalization
preference of Hangul was lost. Fix that. Also, the Thai shaper was
copied from Hangul, so had the fully-composed normalization behavior,
which was unnecessary. So, fix that too.
The d1d69ec52e change broke Kannada badly,
since it was ligating consonants, pushing matra out, and then ligating
with the matra. Adjust for that. See comments.
If two marks form a ligature, retain their previous lig_id, such that
the mark ligature can attach to ligature components...
Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676343
In fact, I noticed that we should not let ligatures form between glyphs
coming from different components of a previous ligature. For example,
if the sequence is: LAM,SHADDA,LAM,FATHA,HEH, the LAM,LAM,HEH form a
ligature, putting SHADDA and FATHA next to eachother. However, it would
be wrong to ligate them. Uniscribe has this bug also.
This commit: a3313e5400 broke MarkMarkPos
when one of the marks itself is a ligature. That regressed 26 Tibetan
tests (up from zero!). Fix that. Tibetan back to zero.
And use it to speed up the hotspot by checking coverage directly in
the main loop, not 10 functions deep in.
Gives me a solid 20% boost with Indic test suite. Less so for less
lookup-intensive scenarios.
Remove the "fast_path" hack from before.
Does not provide Uniscribe-compatible results, but should at least avoid
breaking hb-view due to out-of-order cluster values.
For RTL runs, ensure cluster values are non-increasing (instead of
non-decreasing).
Backporting from upstream:
commit b847f24ce855d24f6822bcd9c0006905e81b94d8
Author: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad@behdad.org>
Date: Wed Jul 25 19:29:16 2012 -0400
[arabic] Fix Arabic cursive positioning
This was clearly broken in testing. Who knows... Fixes for me.
Test with a Nastaleeq font, or with Arabic Typesetting.
Backporting from Chromium.
This was broken as a result of 7b84c536c1.
As Khaled reported, MarkMark positioning was broken with glyphs
resulting from a MultipleSubst. Fixed. Test with the ALLAH character
in Amiri.
Does not attempt to handle clusters in a Uniscribe- or HarfBuzz-compatible way;
just returns the original string indexes that CT maintains. These may even be
out-of-order in the case of reordrant glyphs.
The font is forming a post-base consonant in some samples, and Uniscribe
positions top matra on the post-base. Do the same.
Gurmukhi failures down from 59 to 41 (0.0674242%).
Just put it before base, which is what's expected.
Malayalam failures down from 1559 to 1197 (0.114172%).
BENGALI: 353988 out of 354285 tests passed. 297 failed (0.0838308%)
DEVANAGARI: 693571 out of 693628 tests passed. 57 failed (0.00821766%)
GUJARATI: 366489 out of 366506 tests passed. 17 failed (0.0046384%)
GURMUKHI: 60750 out of 60809 tests passed. 59 failed (0.0970251%)
KANNADA: 950956 out of 951913 tests passed. 957 failed (0.100534%)
KHMER: 299094 out of 299124 tests passed. 30 failed (0.0100293%)
MALAYALAM: 1047219 out of 1048416 tests passed. 1197 failed (0.114172%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271699 out of 271847 tests passed. 148 failed (0.0544424%)
TAMIL: 1091837 out of 1091837 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)
TELUGU: 970524 out of 970573 tests passed. 49 failed (0.00504856%)
The sequence Ra,H,Ya in Bengali is ambigious and Unicode encoded that to
get Ya-Phalaa, one would place ZWJ before Halant. Ie. a ZWJ,H sequence
requests subjoining, while a H,ZWJ requests Half form. Implement that.
Bengali failures go down from 377 to 297 (0.0838308%).
Gujarati is down by 4 to 17 (0.0046384%).
Kannada is down by 226 to 957 (0.100534%).
Current status:
BENGALI: 353988 out of 354285 tests passed. 297 failed (0.0838308%)
DEVANAGARI: 693571 out of 693628 tests passed. 57 failed (0.00821766%)
GUJARATI: 366489 out of 366506 tests passed. 17 failed (0.0046384%)
GURMUKHI: 60750 out of 60809 tests passed. 59 failed (0.0970251%)
KANNADA: 950956 out of 951913 tests passed. 957 failed (0.100534%)
KHMER: 299094 out of 299124 tests passed. 30 failed (0.0100293%)
MALAYALAM: 1046857 out of 1048416 tests passed. 1559 failed (0.148701%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271699 out of 271847 tests passed. 148 failed (0.0544424%)
TAMIL: 1091837 out of 1091837 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)
TELUGU: 970524 out of 970573 tests passed. 49 failed (0.00504856%)
Also limit joiners.
This limits our syllable length to a constant, and is
closer to what Uniscribe does anyway.
Two Devanagari tests regressed, but who cares about tests with 20
joiners in a row?! Devanagari at 57 (0.00821766%) now.
In Khmer coeng model, a V,Ra can go *after* matras. If it goes after a
split matra, it should be reordered to *before* the left part of such matra.
Khmer failures down from 136 to 39 (0.0130381%).
Apparently if there is C,V,ZWJ,C, the first C will be base, but if
it's C,ZWJ,V,C, the second one will be.
Note that Uniscribe implements this differently, by breaking syllable in
the case of C,ZWJ,V,C and putting the first consonant in one syllable
and the rest in the next syllable.
Sinhala failures down from 208 to 158 (0.0581209%). No changes to
Khmer.
Sinhala does not have half forms. And most (all?) consonants can be
base, except when preceded by ZWJ, which would request a subjoined form.
Hence switch the base algorithm to categorize with Khmer, start search
at start, and stop at a ZWJ.
Also, mark all pos=base consonants after base to be subjoined. Mark
base itself to have pos=base.
Finally, adjust Sinhala's reph position to after-main.
Brings down Sinhala failures from 455 to 328 (0.120656%).
If, say, a H,ZWJ,C ligature was formed, we don't want the code to detec
that as a Halant. So, ignore ligatures when matching category in
final_reordering.
Sinhala failures down from 514 to 455 (0.167374%).
Seems to be about what Uniscribe does. Not exactly. But close enough.
More consonants will start a new cluster.
A few scripts went way down in failures. In particular:
- Devanagari failures went down from 490 to 56.
- Telugu went down from 113 to 49.
Other scripts went down slightly or didn't change. New numbers:
BENGALI: 353908 out of 354285 tests passed. 377 failed (0.106412%)
DEVANAGARI: 693572 out of 693628 tests passed. 56 failed (0.00807349%)
GUJARATI: 366485 out of 366506 tests passed. 21 failed (0.00572978%)
GURMUKHI: 60750 out of 60809 tests passed. 59 failed (0.0970251%)
KANNADA: 950730 out of 951913 tests passed. 1183 failed (0.124276%)
KHMER: 298613 out of 299124 tests passed. 511 failed (0.170832%)
MALAYALAM: 1046881 out of 1048416 tests passed. 1535 failed (0.146411%)
ORIYA: 42320 out of 42329 tests passed. 9 failed (0.021262%)
SINHALA: 271333 out of 271847 tests passed. 514 failed (0.189077%)
TAMIL: 1091837 out of 1091837 tests passed. 0 failed (0%)
TELUGU: 970524 out of 970573 tests passed. 49 failed (0.00504856%)
Some of the remaining Telugu and Devanagari issues seem to be Uniscribe
eating Anusvara when placed before a non-joiner. Ouch!
Uniscribe reorders U+0E3A to be after U+0E38 and U+0E39. We do that by
modifying the ccc for U+0E3A.
Fixes the two remaining Thai failures (see previous commit).
Adjust the list of marks before SARA AM that get the reordering
treatment. Also adjust cluster formation to match Uniscribe.
With Wikipedia test data, now I see:
- For Thai, with the Angsana New font from Win7, I see 54 failures out
of over 4M tests (0.00129107%). Of the 54, two are legitimate
reordering issues (fix coming soon), and the other 52 are simply
Uniscribe using a zero-width space char instead of an unknown
character for missing glyphs. No idea why. The missing-glyph
sequences include one that is a Thai character followed by an Arabic
Sokun. Someone confused it with Nikhahit I assume!
- For Lao, with the Dokchampa font from Win7, 33 tests fail out of
54k (0.0615167%). All seem to be insignificant mark positioning
with two marks on a base. Have to investigate.
Behdad Esfahbod
Jonathan Kew