Commit Graph

3728 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Behdad Esfahbod 98e3ea8e34 Fix hb-uniscribe build 2015-03-04 12:03:39 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 8ac345e5c0 Fix reverse_range() to only reverse alt array if positions are used
In hb-coretext, when we were using scratch buffer for book-keeping,
a reverse_range() caused by the notdef-insertion loop could mess up
our log_clusters.  Ouch!
2015-03-02 16:06:55 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 1e03d7ac83 Better error message if libtool is not installed
Fixes https://github.com/behdad/harfbuzz/pull/88
2015-02-26 13:59:13 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 6c918e2997 Clean up gtk-doc.make 2015-02-26 13:59:13 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 5ec5875acb Install git.mk in docs/ 2015-02-26 13:59:13 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod d146678d10 Update git.mk from upstream 2015-02-26 13:59:13 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 5f541f8f7b Minor refactoring 2015-02-25 15:43:35 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod ef79bdf73b Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:35 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 68e04afbb1 Typo 2015-02-25 15:43:34 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 55553699b3 Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:34 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 5175300fba [layout] Fix comparison of GlyphID and hb_codepoint_t
Before, the IntType::cmp functions providing this and was truncating
the hb_codepoint_t to 16bits before comparison.  I have no idea how
this was never discovered, and I'm too lazy to try to reproduce this
with Pango (which uses non-16bit codepoint numbers for missing glyphs).
2015-02-25 15:43:34 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 7cce809cb1 Remove unused (and wrong as of a few commits ago) cmp() function 2015-02-25 15:43:34 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 8e3d4bae03 Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:33 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod f47cf1f12d Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:33 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 640b66c634 [layout] If lookup has only one subtable, move the forward loop down to subtable
I was hoping to see a nice speedup, but it resulted in a very minor one.
2015-02-25 15:43:33 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod e2f50f2a7e [layout] Add apply_forward / apply_backward 2015-02-25 15:43:32 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 1d4a328472 [layout] Remove unneeded return value from apply() 2015-02-25 15:43:32 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod bbdd6fd21c Minor simpilfy BEInt 2015-02-25 15:43:32 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 88a399acdc Optimize IntType comparison to avoid branches for 16bit numbers 2015-02-25 15:43:32 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 37de2d5331 Minor simplify IntType 2015-02-25 15:43:31 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod bd047d3b7f [layout] Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:31 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod b9d3f60520 [layout] Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:31 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 1a2322134a [layout] Don't check glyph props against lookup flags when recursing
Shouldn't be needed.  I have a hard time imagining this breaking any
legitimate use case.
2015-02-25 15:43:30 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 095a1257cc [layout] Port sanitize() to use dispatch()
Needed some rework of Extension table.  Hopefully I got it right, and
the new template usage doesn't break any compilers...
2015-02-25 15:43:30 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 758fb20630 Remove unused macro 2015-02-25 15:43:30 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 40c58923cb [layout] Refactor Lookup::dispatch() 2015-02-25 15:43:30 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 70366f5d19 [layout] Refactor get_subtable() 2015-02-25 15:43:29 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod f72f326aea Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:29 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 8e36ccfd4f [layout] Use dispatch() for add_coverage() 2015-02-25 15:43:29 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 50b8dc79da [layout] Add may_dispatch()
No functional change right now.
2015-02-25 15:43:29 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod de2118ed7a Make sanitize() a const method
This makes a lot of code safer.  We only try modifying the object in one
place, after making sure it's safe to do so.  So, do a const_cast<> in
that one place...
2015-02-25 15:43:28 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 6759ed95a3 Minor 2015-02-25 15:43:28 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 6b599dac1f Remove unnecessary check in sanitize 2015-02-25 15:43:28 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 365576d246 [layout] Allocate iters in the context
Can be further optimized, but I think I didn't break anything.

Saves another 3% off Roboto shaping.
2015-02-25 15:43:28 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 514564f544 [layout] Move skippy_iter setup from constructor into init() 2015-02-25 15:43:27 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod b051be542a [lookup] Add skippy_iter.reset()
Towards reducing the cost of initializing skippy_iter()
2015-02-25 15:43:27 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 2cecc38c7c [layout] Shuffle code around 2015-02-25 15:43:27 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 696266981d [layout] Merge forward and backward iterators 2015-02-25 15:43:26 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 1f038eec3c [layout] Fix backward reject()
Has no functional effect since reject was never used with
match_glyph_data.
2015-02-25 15:43:26 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 37d13acd8d [layout] Remove some unnecessary checks in skippy 2015-02-25 15:43:26 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod baa14e1814 [lookup] Don't initialize skippy if coverage match fails
Currently:

  - Initializing skippy is very expensive,

  - Our lookup accelerator (using set-digests) can be very ineffecite,

As such, we end up many times initializing skippy but then failing
coverage check.  Reordering fixes that.

When, later, we fix our accelerator to have truly small false-positive
rate (for example by using the frozen-sets), then we might want to
reorder these checks such that we wouldn't calculate coverage number
if skippy is going to fail.

This shows a 5% speedup with Roboto already.
2015-02-25 15:43:26 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 7788993bc1 [layout] Use setter method to set c->lookup_props 2015-02-25 15:43:25 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod f4ee48fd7b [layout] Remove unused wrapper method 2015-02-25 15:43:25 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 7b7129c7a9 Add hb_frozen_set_t
I experimented with replacing use of hb_set_digest_t with this new
hb_frozen_set_t, hoping to get a huge speedup for busy lookups
(like kern lookup in Roboto), but I only got 6% speendup in Roboto
and 4% in NotoNastaliqUrduDraft :(.
2015-02-25 15:43:25 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 241eac9559 Hide internals of lookup accelerators 2015-02-25 15:43:25 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod e2d4e8480d [util] Add convenience "make lib" target 2015-02-25 15:43:24 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod faaae64bf2 Merge pull request #85 from KonstantinRitt/define_inline
Fix build with MSVC on CE
2015-02-25 15:34:34 -08:00
Konstantin Ritt 9768e651be Fix build with MSVC on CE
This code is C++ only. There isn't a single C++ compiler that fails to
understand the "inline" keyword, since it's required by C++98. Any
compiler older than C++98 is likely to choke on the template usage
further down, so this isn't necessary.

Moreover, the C++ standard says you cannot define macros.
[lib.macro.names] says "Nor shall such a translation unit define macros
for names lexically identical to keywords." -- technically, it's a
promise that the Standard Library headers won't do it, the wording means
that the entire translation unit won't do it, which implies no source
can do it.

MSVC complains about it:
fatal error C1189: #error : The C++ Standard Library forbids macroizing
keywords. Enable warning C4005 to find the forbidden macro.

Author: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macieira@intel.com>
2015-02-14 00:58:51 +04:00
Behdad Esfahbod 7888a6b07a [ft] Handle negative scales with vertical writing 2015-01-28 12:40:40 -08:00
Behdad Esfahbod 982d94eaa2 [coretext] Don't generate notdef glyph for default-ignorables
As discovered on Chrome Mac:
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=452326
2015-01-28 10:51:33 -08:00