The previous constant opj_c13318 was mysteriously equal to 2/K , and in
the DWT, we had to divide K and opj_c13318 by 2... The issue was that the
band->stepsize computation in tcd.c didn't take into account the log2gain of
the band.
The effect of this change is expected to be mostly equivalent to the previous
situation, except some difference in rounding. But it leads to a dramatic
reduction of the mean square error and peak error in the irreversible encoding
of issue141.tif !
Update the bench_dwt utility to have a -decode/-encode switch
Measured performance gains for DWT encoder on a
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700HQ CPU @ 2.60GHz (4 cores, hyper threaded)
Encoding time:
$ ./bin/bench_dwt -encode -num_threads 1
time for dwt_encode: total = 8.348 s, wallclock = 8.352 s
$ ./bin/bench_dwt -encode -num_threads 2
time for dwt_encode: total = 9.776 s, wallclock = 4.904 s
$ ./bin/bench_dwt -encode -num_threads 4
time for dwt_encode: total = 13.188 s, wallclock = 3.310 s
$ ./bin/bench_dwt -encode -num_threads 8
time for dwt_encode: total = 30.024 s, wallclock = 4.064 s
Scaling is probably limited by memory access patterns causing
memory access to be the bottleneck.
The slightly worse results with threads==8 than with thread==4
is due to hyperthreading being not appropriate here.
* -PLT switch added to opj_compress
* Add a opj_encoder_set_extra_options() function that
accepts a PLT=YES option, and could be expanded later
for other uses.
-------
Testing with a Sentinel2 10m band, T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02.jp2,
coming from S2A_MSIL1C_20160914T074612_N0204_R135_T36JTT_20160914T081456.SAFE
Decompress it to TIFF:
```
opj_uncompress -i T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02.jp2 -o T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02.tif
```
Recompress it with similar parameters as original:
```
opj_compress -n 5 -c [256,256],[256,256],[256,256],[256,256],[256,256] -t 1024,1024 -PLT -i T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02.tif -o T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02_PLT.jp2
```
Dump codestream detail with GDAL dump_jp2.py utility (https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/blob/master/gdal/swig/python/samples/dump_jp2.py)
```
python dump_jp2.py T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02.jp2 > /tmp/dump_sentinel2_ori.txt
python dump_jp2.py T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02_PLT.jp2 > /tmp/dump_sentinel2_openjpeg_plt.txt
```
The diff between both show very similar structure, and identical number of packets in PLT markers
Now testing with Kakadu (KDU803_Demo_Apps_for_Linux-x86-64_200210)
Full file decompression:
```
kdu_expand -i T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02_PLT.jp2 -o tmp.tif
Consumed 121 tile-part(s) from a total of 121 tile(s).
Consumed 80,318,806 codestream bytes (excluding any file format) = 5.329697
bits/pel.
Processed using the multi-threaded environment, with
8 parallel threads of execution
```
Partial decompresson (presumably using PLT markers):
```
kdu_expand -i T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02.jp2 -o tmp.pgm -region "{0.5,0.5},{0.01,0.01}"
kdu_expand -i T36JTT_20160914T074612_B02_PLT.jp2 -o tmp2.pgm -region "{0.5,0.5},{0.01,0.01}"
diff tmp.pgm tmp2.pgm && echo "same !"
```
-------
Funded by ESA for S2-MPC project
This was changed some time ago (https://google.github.io/oss-fuzz/getting-started/new-project-guide/) but the build didn't fail as there is a fallback mechanism. The main advantage of the new approach is that for libFuzzer this produces more performant binaries (as `$LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE` expands into `-fsanitize=fuzzer`, which links libFuzzer from the compiler-rt, allowing better optimization tricks).
I'm also experimenting with dataflow (https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/1632) on your project, and the dataflow config doesn't have a fallback (as it's a new configuration), therefore I'm proposing a change to migrate from `-lFuzzingEngine` to `$LIB_FUZZING_ENGINE`.
There is currently a false positive ABI check failure between v2.3.1
and current. It disappears when removing the generated reports of v2.3.1
and recreating them. It is likely that some tooling has evolved since
the initial v2.3.1 report generation.
Previously the multiple component transformation SGcod(C)
and wavelet transformation SPcod(H)/SPcoc(E) parameter
values were never checked, allowing for out of range values.
The lack of validation allowed the bit stream provided in
issue #1158 through. After this commit an error message
points to the marker segments' parameters as being out of
range.
input/nonregression/edf_c2_20.jp2 contains an SPcod(H) value
of 17, but according to Table A-20 of the specification only
values 0 and 1 are valid. input/nonregression/issue826.jp2
contains a SGcod(B) value of 2, but according to Table A-17
of the specification only values 0 and 1 are valid.
input/nonregression/oss-fuzz2785.jp2 contains a SGcod(B)
value of 32, but it is likewise limited to 0 or 1. These test
cases have been updated to consistently fail to parse the
headers since they contain out of bounds values.
This fixes issue #1210.
Even Rouault
szukw000
Eduardo Barretto
Max Moroz
Robert Ancell
Sebastian Rasmussen