* checkio: Fixed potential usage of invalid iterator.
* formatted the code.
A ticket about FN (invalidIterator1) is created at https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/8373
* Fixes issue with case inside switch that is not a compound statement was treated as garbage
This fixes an issue with the check for case keywords outside of switch
detection that would treat a case statement inside a switch that is not
a compound statement as garbage, but this is perfectly valid C++. This
construct is used in several libraries, i.e. Google Test.
* Tweak check and handle missing semicolon
Tweaks the check with feedback from danmar.
Handle the case where there is no semicolon and document it with a unit
test.
Implemented tests for the following windows configurations (more will
follow):
-Semaphore usage
-lstrcat function configuration
-_countof macro configuration
-Mutex usage
-Library usage (LoadLibrary, GetProcAddress, ...)
[std::]strtoimax and [std::]strtoumax:
They were nearly completely duplicates, i removed the ones with
less/missing configuration.
std::basic_string::empty:
It was found to be redundant because very likely someone forgot to
change "empty" to "clear" when copy&pasting the function names. The
empty function in all these clear functions makes no sense, and the
clear function also was missing.
std::queue::empty and std::array:empty:
They were both twice in the same function name list.
std::string::size, std::wstring::size:
They were already configured with many other size functions above.
std::basic_string::size:
This entry was twice in the same function name list directly one after
another. Very likely one of them should be the length function, which
does simply the same but was missing in the std.cfg.
By telling cppcheck about the Microsoft Windows _countof() macro it is
now able to detect out of bounds array accesses like this:
wchar_t buf[10];
for(size_t i = 0; i <= (_countof(buf)); ++i) {
buf[i] = L'\0'; // (error) Array 'buf[10]' accessed at index 10, which
is out of bounds.
}
I intentionally removed the second access() configuraion because it was
missing the use-retval attribute. But calling access() without using the
return value is absolutely senseless.
I added tests to posix.c to verify the correct configuration of
access().
