ef687af91b
createrelease: updated sed commands to write version
2021-07-04 08:41:55 +02:00
3e3e9d8c50
2.5; Update versions
2021-07-04 08:40:41 +02:00
0e4b460d85
AUTHORS: Added authors for 2.5 release
2021-07-04 08:23:28 +02:00
c489626167
updated copyright year
2021-07-04 08:09:11 +02:00
5287a6b55c
wxwidgets.cfg: Added support for more interfaces
2021-07-03 20:07:48 +02:00
7f4a4c4b52
lupdate gui.pro
2021-07-03 15:38:07 +02:00
19dd034ea9
windows installer; Added bento4.cfg and windows.cfg
2021-07-03 15:30:50 +02:00
0bb334c102
astyle formatting
2021-07-03 09:12:51 +02:00
fb9d659e25
Fix 10326: Regression: ValueFlow; Wrong Uninit value after do while ( #3312 )
2021-07-03 09:12:26 +02:00
fc90598077
Typos found by running "codespell" ( #3324 )
2021-07-02 17:41:51 +02:00
30af910b85
wxwidgets.cfg: Added support for more interfaces
2021-07-02 13:17:55 +02:00
68898e2be0
fix #10335 (Type alias remains unknown with using) ( #3323 )
...
Co-authored-by: Robert Reif <reif@FX6840>
2021-07-02 06:19:26 +02:00
5426ac6a22
run dmake
2021-07-01 22:26:42 +02:00
1a5449cbeb
Fixed #10327 (ValueFlow; Wrong Uninit value in called function)
2021-07-01 22:08:00 +02:00
869eac5670
astyle formatting
2021-07-01 21:09:32 +02:00
7a51fc8232
Add regression test for #8942 ( #3321 )
2021-07-01 21:09:06 +02:00
426117a30d
misra: Improve warning messages for rule 8.2 when the missing arguments are on the next line ( #3320 )
...
This makes it easier for the user to find the violation.
Suggested in the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/development/thread/801dc07e59/#a1a8/d3e9/c455/8915/747c/2525/0eb8/0f7d
2021-07-01 21:08:40 +02:00
9be88a06fe
Add regression test for #9176 ( #3319 )
2021-07-01 13:58:00 +02:00
e1cff1d1ef
Fixed #10334 (AST: hang with c++ initializer and emplace_back)
2021-06-30 21:40:45 +02:00
e50f7a3e09
astyle formatting
2021-06-30 20:27:35 +02:00
0c66f47fe0
Add vcl.cfg
2021-06-30 07:49:45 +02:00
5b1420ff64
Add regression test for #10215 ( #3317 )
2021-06-29 19:42:47 +02:00
10123b4ad2
misra: Emit more accurate warnings for unused arguments in rule 2.7 ( #3314 )
...
Make the MISRA addon emit extra warnings for unused arguments placed in
lines other than the function definition. This makes it easier for the
user to find violations.
2021-06-29 11:17:38 +02:00
1783fd1bba
duplicateBreak; Allow extra return that clarifies for tool(s) that function does not continue
2021-06-29 11:17:12 +02:00
a2cb9f17c1
misra: Don't consider variadic arguments as the violation of rule 2.7 ( #3315 )
...
The MISRA 2012 standard does not say anything about variadic functions
in the definition of rule 2.7. Therefore, these cases should be
considered as false positives.
2021-06-29 08:46:35 +02:00
2bc87d13e1
Bump simplecpp
2021-06-28 19:47:37 +02:00
33fb855ff9
win_installer; Add dpdk.cfg to installation
2021-06-28 17:40:26 +02:00
7944ea9937
Initial support for DPDK functions ( #3313 )
2021-06-28 17:38:44 +02:00
62dbe2eb2f
misra: Fix false positives for rule 8.2 ( #3311 )
...
Reported in the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/development/thread/801dc07e59/?page=1&limit=25#a1a8
2021-06-27 22:57:50 +02:00
6432922c76
misra: Fix crash on rule 8.2 ( #3310 )
...
The example code that reproduces this crash:
```
int misra_8_2_o(
const uint32_t a1,
const uint8_t *const a2
)
{ return *a2 + a1; }
int misra_8_2_p(
const uint32_t a1,
const uint8_t *const a2
);
```
The unit test was not added because it looks like a typo and regressions
are unlikely.
2021-06-27 22:57:37 +02:00
b89f5fbeff
misra: Fix 8.2 false positives ( #3309 )
...
* misra: Fix 8.2 false positives
Fix false positives in rule 8.2 that occurred in cases when we have a
function definition and declaration in the same file.
For example, the following code generated false positives before this
commit:
```
void f(uint8_t * const x);
void f(uint8_t * const x)
{ (void)x; }
```
We need to distinguish the declaration and the definition, so the dump
file generation routine was extended to keep token where the definition
of the function. The analysis in the addon also been improved.
Closes Trac issue: https://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/10219
2021-06-27 10:51:32 +02:00
05df31c12a
Fixed unit tests
2021-06-27 09:04:47 +02:00
2a2e071a85
Tokenizer::simplifyAttribute; Set function attribute for function pointer
2021-06-26 14:23:39 +02:00
66956ed959
Fix 10323: Wrong known value. x!=0 does not mean that x==1 ( #3308 )
2021-06-26 09:16:45 +02:00
508188df2b
Fix 10297: Regression; ValueFlow known value, sign conversion ( #3307 )
2021-06-26 09:16:04 +02:00
bf019a1ab2
Run dmake
2021-06-25 16:44:41 +02:00
9769afe434
knownConditionTrueFalse; avoid several warnings when nonzero expression is compared to see if it is positive or negative
2021-06-25 16:25:25 +02:00
452c92494e
misra: Fix 8.2 false positives ( #3306 )
...
Type declaration on the next line is not allowed in rule 8.2. But we
need to make sure that the files of the checked files are the same.
Reported on the forum: https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/development/thread/801dc07e59/#32c3/e90b/293e/39df/85b3/b821/e0c3
2021-06-25 16:06:29 +02:00
a45e0776f2
windows installer; Add vcl.cfg
2021-06-25 09:15:26 +02:00
3ed042fcfc
wxwidgets.cfg: Added support for more interfaces
2021-06-25 08:01:00 +02:00
2f7f43e1f2
astyle formatting
2021-06-24 23:19:59 +02:00
39f9bc7422
Fix #10304 : std::distance() returns std::ptrdiff_t ( #3297 )
2021-06-24 23:19:29 +02:00
769b20b426
ValueFlow: Clarify note when impossible value is assigned ( #10297 )
2021-06-24 17:10:06 +02:00
79f59d8f39
misra: Fixed crash with struct fields with unknown types on 9.x rules ( #3305 )
...
This fixes the crash on with struct fields containing unknown types
reported on the forum:
https://sourceforge.net/p/cppcheck/discussion/general/thread/d64551cc55/#5f0f
The suggested patch doesn't handle the cases when there are struct
fields with arrays containing unknown types. So the addon will not
generate warnings in these cases. The problem is that Cppcheck doesn't
generate valueType-pointer information for unknown types in the dump
file. When adding this in symboldatabase.cpp, MISRA addon will generate
a lot of false positives because we depend on the null value of
valueType.
So I suppose it better to left this as is, to don't break the addon for
such rare cases.
2021-06-24 08:29:27 +02:00
b13e44fce5
Fix 10309 and 10034: internalAstError with init lists ( #3303 )
2021-06-24 08:25:13 +02:00
6e74fc64b9
Fix 10317: Regression: internalAstError on valid C++ code ( #3302 )
2021-06-24 08:22:03 +02:00
dc582560cc
Add default parameter to next() to prevent StopIteration exception when no corresponding rawToken is found for '[' token ( #3301 )
...
Co-authored-by: Ivar Bonsaksen <ivar.bonsaksen@microchip.com>
2021-06-19 20:24:21 +02:00
2c8c8a5fa6
Readd cppcheck-errors.rng
2021-06-19 19:44:36 +02:00
2d08564c8a
astyle formatting
2021-06-19 14:47:35 +02:00
dd178c3ad9
Fix 10314: Possible nullPointerRedundantCheck false positive ( #3298 )
2021-06-19 13:59:48 +02:00
Daniel Marjamäki
orbitcowboy
Paul Fultz II
Armin Müller
Robert Reif
chrchr-github
Georgiy Komarov
PJ Aitken
Ivar Andreas Bonsaksen