When using a variable that is assigned a function pointer checks for
pointers are triggered which would complain if used in arithmetic
comparisions (eventhough it will be valid code if the function returns
an int)
- Changed behaviour of Token::function - is now also set for declarations
- Resolved TODO in testclass.cpp
- removed redundant code in Scope::findFunction - it is safe to call nextArgument() on functions without arguments
- Use Token::function in checkother.cpp
- Fixed lots of cppcheck messages about functions that can be const or static
- Fixed possible nullpointer dereference message in symboldatabase.cpp
- Replaced tokAt(+-1) by next()/previous()
- Iterate over variable list instead of token list
- Don't stop whole checking after bailing out (continue; instead of break;)
- Support types with qualified names
- For each class/struct/union, a Type instance is added to SymbolDatabase::typeList.
- A scope is no longer created for declared but not defined types
Fixed name detection for classes when they are declared like this: "class ::Foo::Sub {..."
- Make CheckOther::checkCastIntToCharAndBack() work for multiple variables at once
- Improved messages of CheckOther::checkSuspiciousSemicolon() and CheckOther::checkPipeParameterSize()
- Rename Token::isOp() to Token::isConstOp() (indicating that the operator does _not_ modify the input variables)
- Create new Token::isOp(), returning true also for ++, -- and assignment operators
- Make Token::isExtendedOp() returning also true for all assignment and ++/-- operators
1. fix typos / misspellings
- Fix misspelling within comments, variable/function names, stdout messages
- changes the name of an error code: ```stlBoundries``` changed to ```stlBoundaries```. Alias old name (```stlBoundries```) to the new one.
2. fix gcc v3.4.6 32bit & 64bit warnings
- fixes gcc v3.4.6 warnings, except for those in tinyxml and "-Wmissing-declarations" makefile warnings
- in Preprocessor::handleIncludes(), replace a ```vector <bool>``` with ```stack<bool>``` (see ```vector<bool>``` warning below).
- this is the only ```vector<bool>``` in the codebase
- ```vector <bool>``` is actually a case of template specialization, and is not recommended, according to the following links:
http://stackoverflow.com/q/6461487http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2007/n2160.htmlhttp://stackoverflow.com/q/670308
- in the codebase before and after this change, testrunner SEGVs in a number of places on gcc v3.4.6, including ```Check::~Check()```, among others
- fc42fc95 fixes this particular runtime issue for DJGPP & __sun
Found by clang:
lib/checkother.cpp:2992:31: warning: private field '_symbolDatabase' is not used
[-Wunused-private-field]
const SymbolDatabase *_symbolDatabase;
Signed-off-by: Stefan Naewe <stefan.naewe@googlemail.com>
*** Timing of the test suite ***
Four runs were used to calculate the average run time.
Before: ~1,103s
After: ~1,066s
Speed up: 3,35%
*** Timing of internal projects using STL ***
Before: ~8,301s
After: ~8,207s
Speed up: 1,13%
So the real world speed up is roughly 1%.
- fix g++ warning:
> lib/checkother.cpp:3779: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
- fix suncc warning (see [everything2](http://everything2.com/title/C%252B%252B%253A+static+extern+%2522C%2522)):
> "lib/checkmemoryleak.cpp", line 578: Warning (Anachronism): Formal argument __compar of type extern "C" int(*)(const void*,const void*) in call to bsearch(const void*, const void*, unsigned long, unsigned long, extern "C" int(*)(const void*,const void*)) is being passed int(*)(const void*,const void*).
- prefer empty() / isEmpty() over "size() > 0" (cases not caught by stlSize)
- fix word misspellings (mostly comments, a few output lines)
- Parenthesis => Parentheses (both variations were used in the codebase)
- fix typo and wording ("never alwayw") in gui/test/data/benchmark/simple.cpp's CheckOther::unsignedPositive():
```
- "An unsigned variable will never alwayw be positive so it is either pointless or "
+ "An unsigned variable can't be negative so it is either pointless or "
```
- Check for sizeof(ptr)/something: This indicates that programmer was trying to calculate array size, but sizeof(ptr) doesn't return the length of the memory area, but size of a pointer.
- Check for sizeof()*sizeof(): This indicates that programmer misunderstood what sizeof() does: It does return the length in bytes of the given variable, not e.g. the number of elements in an array.